Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Carrie Prejean, gay marriage, Marion Barry, Perez Hilton, Proposition 8

DC Councilman Marion Crackbarry
Barry, D.C.’s former crack-smoking mayor, (the ‘former’ referring to the job title, not necessarily the crack-smoking part) is back in the news.
Councilman CrackBarry was the only person on the D.C. City Council to vote against a bill that would legalize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.
In the Washington Post Barry is quoted as follows:
“All hell is going to break lose. We may have a civil war. The black community is just adamant against this.”
Although Barry personally has long supported Gay rights, he has claimed his recent vote against the bill reflected the views of his Southeast Washington constituency.
“What you’ve got to understand is 98 percent of my constituents are black and we don’t have but a handful of openly gay residents,” Barry said. “Secondly, at least 70 percent of those who express themselves to me about this are opposed to anything dealing with this issue. The ministers think it is a sin, and I have to be sensitive to that…”
Take it for what it is…a crackhead’s opinion. Yes, in pure numbers it’s fair to say that the majority of African-Americans may not be in agreement with gay marriage, but it is unfair to broad stroke allege that the whole of the community is adamant against it. It’s simply untrue.
The Mo’Kelly Report is an entertainment journal with a political slant; published weekly at www.eurweb.com. It is meant to inform, infuse and incite meaningful discourse…as well as entertain. The Mo’Kelly Report is syndicated by Blogburst. For more Mo’Kelly, http://mokellyreport.wordpress.com. Mo’Kelly can be reached at mrmokelly@gmail.com and he welcomes all commentary.
Subscribe to The Mo’Kelly Report HERE
Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)
5 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>













I’m a little more concerned about the welfare of black males in the city of Chicago, than I am about “civil unions”. I’m sorry. It’s about the pressing issues at hand in front of me. I don’t see any folks under the rainbow coming to my neighborhood to help me with my problem.
Comment by Zack Isaacs 05.06.2009 @ 6:37 PMThis is a gay/white concern, the black people I know are completely against this.I wouldn’t go as far to say that there will be a civil war but as stated the majority is against “same sex marriage”. Too Zack’s point I hear more concern about how to stop street culture from influencing our youth. We are losing too much intellectual capital to the street.
Comment by Gua 05.07.2009 @ 3:43 AMI agree with the former DC mayor on this issue. I am not a religious person (I subscribe to no religious belief system) but I do believe that sex is supposed to be between a man and a woman. Marraige too. The purpose of sex is to creat new life, to procreate. The purpose of marraige is to create snf advance the family (man, woman, shild). Homosexuality has no place in either scenario. If I see another young brother prancing down the street with skin-tight jeans on clutching a “man-purse” I’m gonna go crazy. What happened? It just seems like all of a sudden homosexuality is everywhere!
Comment by victamoor 05.07.2009 @ 4:43 AMNo one ever accused our Mayor CrackBarry of failing to know how to motivate and suck-up-to his voting block.
I take exception to Zack suggesting that no gays are engaged in the urban blight problems. I have been here in DC in a ghetto neighborhood where I lived serving as a neighborhood commissioner who was very engaged in reversing the deterioration of the housing stock, the fight against the drug dealer’s invasion and the necessity of making social net services available to single mothers barely making enough to survive and feed their children.
Admittedly not terribly common but, let’s face facts, the gay community has had quite a battle against being beaten in street hate crimes because some brutish redneck hates fags and fighting for the right to be not fired or not evicted merely because the landlord or employer suddenly decides they don’t want gays around. Case in point – consider Cracker Barrel which for decades had a published HR policy statement that anyone even suspected of being gay or lesbian was to be immediately fired regardless of a fine job performance.
This kind of stuff is why it is important not to make civil rights subject to a popularity (voting) contest. If the 1964 Civil Rights Act had been placed on the national ballot, I’m pretty darned sure it would never have passed and that would have been shameful. If Loving v. Virginia had never been decided by the Supreme Court, it is unlikely we would have dedicated marriages of inter-racial couples.
Cheers to the author for this posting.
Comment by David 05.07.2009 @ 10:33 AMThe “author” has a name you know. It’s Mo’Kelly.
Anyway, I really don’t see the parallel. Inner city kids don’t know much about how discrimination works, as much as they know how it feels. Sometimes subtle racism is FAR WORSE than explicit statements of hatred. At least when a racist/bigot is being upfront, you can devise a strategy. That is not the case when you can’t speak your mind unless you want to be reprimanded.
Notice, I wrote nothing about D.C.; I wrote about Chicago instead. I understand your concerns, but I was just trying to convey my own. There aren’t any rainbow folks coming by neighborhood to see what I need. That’s the truth and before I take it back, I’ll add more to it.
Comment by Zack Isaacs 05.08.2009 @ 10:49 PM